Social and Economic Implications of Amendment One

The upcoming May 8th ballot in North Carolina will include the notorious same-sex marriage amendment that is attempting to add the ban of same-sex marriage to the state constitution.

Amendment One is defined as an act to amend the constitution to provide that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state. Same-sex marriage is already banned in NC, but this amendment is attempting to actually include the ruling in the NC state constitution. Voters and politicians believe that the incorporation of the amendment into the constitution could be viewed as discrimination.

Although gay-marraige isn’t supported in NC, many believe that defining marriage as a domestic legal union only between a man and a woman would hurt the state’s economy. In a recent Associated Press article, U.S. Senator Kay Hagan claimed that incorporating Amendment One into the state constitution would “discourage companies with gay-friendly policies from building or expanding in NC.”

“At a time when our economy is already struggling to grow once again, it does not make sense to create an unnecessary road block for attracting new businesses,”claims the Protect All NC Families organization. “If the Amendment would cost us one job, that is one job too many in the current economic climate.”

The US economy has been fluctuating ever the global recession began back in 2008, but according to a recent article by The Guardian, the end of 2011 look to bring positive light to the situation. The economy expanded at a 3% annual rate during the last three months of the year, the most since early 2010. This doesn’t seem to be the best time to limit the job market by incorporating nothing more than discriminatory rulings into the NC constitution.

But Amendment One isn’t only about the NC economy; it’s about human rights and the way that these rights effect human relationships. The LGBTQ population should not have to endure discrimination because of the state’s failure to recognize their relationships the same way a man and a woman’s are.

A relationship shouldn’t be defined by sexual loyalty. Presbyterian minister, and published author Marvin M. Ellison said that rather than viewing gay-marraige as a union between two partners at an appropriate age, it should be looked at from purely a relational standpoint. “The church should stop promoting marriage, and promote other relationships,” said Ellison. He put a heavy emphasis on the church and society embracing an idea he refers to as “relational integrity.” This refers to the result of accepting LGBTQ relationships, as it would allow US society to understand the defining aspects of relationships by removing the emphasis of sexuality.

“Inclusion is good, but transformation is better,” said Ellison. Transformation can’t happen without the inclusion of LGBTQ rights, and denying Amendment One is the first step on the road to assimilation.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized by edinkins. Bookmark the permalink.

About edinkins

My name is Eric Dinkins and I am a Journalism major at Elon University in Elon, North Carolina. This blog serves an online portfolio, displaying any work I’ve completed pertaining to what I may end up doing in the future. This includes digital work done in Photoshop or Final Cut Pro X, as well as written work that I have done for specific courses or the Elon Magazine/Newspaper. I aspire to learn as much as possible during my undergraduate studies, and I will continue to update this blog as I gain more experience.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s